- I do not believe in the immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it. —Albert Einstein
Meta
Recent Comments
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Also Ran on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- Success1999 on Why Are We Alive?
- Success1999 on Why Are We Alive?
- art on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- siouxz on Why Are We Alive?
- Andrew on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
-
Recent Posts
- Billy Graham on Atheism
- Death of the Caliphate
- Women and Patriarchy
- Fixing Classical Arguments
- God and Other Minds
- Atheism and Common Sense
- Hector Avalos – Six Anti-Secularist Themes
- Do Test Tube Babies Have Souls?
- The Argument from Perfection
- Antony Flew is Dead
- Spiritual or Religious?
- Let’s Make a Deal
- Cosmological Arguments
- Moving to new host
- Huckabee and the U.S. Constitution
- Military Madness
- Torture and American Christianity
- Why atheism?
- IHEU corrects UN Human Rights Council
- Daylight Atheism
- Naturalism’s Touchstone Proposition
- What atheists have in common
- Prayers & Queries
- Does Life Have Meaning?
- Time & Change
Daily Archives: February 13, 2005
War or Reason? a reply to Rev. Charles Stanley
In early March of 2003, a few weeks before the invasion of Iraq, relatives sent me the tape recording of a then recent sermon by the Rev. Dr. Charles Stanley entitled “A Nation at War”. Rev. Stanley is not some … Continue reading
Posted in Articles Highlighted, Bush Wars, Christinsanity
6 Comments
An Irreverent Look at God, Sex & Design
Theists like to argue that design—especially the complex design we see in organisms—is proof there must be a Designer. And theists denigrate evolution precisely because it provides an alternate explanation for design. If evolution suffices, then not only does there … Continue reading
Competing Moralities & Perfect God
The existence of evil is difficult to understand if we assume the universe is the product of a perfect God. However, embrace the scientific/evolutionary viewpoint and evil becomes understandable. After all, what is supremely “good” for the ebola virus is … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Non-Existence Arguments
Leave a comment
Thoughts, Feelings & Faith
People don’t like to be told that their feelings are wrong. Which is understandable. Feeling are, after all, not thoughts. They can’t be proved—or disproved. They just are. Which is why religion animates us, and philosophy does not. Religion is … Continue reading
