- If an action is right for us, it is right for others; and if wrong for others, it is wrong for us. Those who reject that standard simply declare that acts are justified by power. —Noam Chomsky
Meta
Recent Comments
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Also Ran on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- Success1999 on Why Are We Alive?
- Success1999 on Why Are We Alive?
- art on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- siouxz on Why Are We Alive?
- Andrew on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
-
Recent Posts
- Billy Graham on Atheism
- Death of the Caliphate
- Women and Patriarchy
- Fixing Classical Arguments
- God and Other Minds
- Atheism and Common Sense
- Hector Avalos – Six Anti-Secularist Themes
- Do Test Tube Babies Have Souls?
- The Argument from Perfection
- Antony Flew is Dead
- Spiritual or Religious?
- Let’s Make a Deal
- Cosmological Arguments
- Moving to new host
- Huckabee and the U.S. Constitution
- Military Madness
- Torture and American Christianity
- Why atheism?
- IHEU corrects UN Human Rights Council
- Daylight Atheism
- Naturalism’s Touchstone Proposition
- What atheists have in common
- Prayers & Queries
- Does Life Have Meaning?
- Time & Change
Monthly Archives: February 2007
Seeing Red – Understanding Consciousness
An article by John Searle (“Minding the Brain”) in the Nov 2, 2006 edition of The New York Review of Books shows how confused most of us (including philosophers & scientists) are about something as everyday as vision. Searle reviewed … Continue reading
Posted in Naturalism
Leave a comment