<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God &amp; Rocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/</link>
	<description>n. against God or gods, anti-theology, the defense of naturalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:08:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rastaban</title>
		<link>http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Rastaban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Mark, that reminds me of what I always thought was a perfectly acceptable theistic answer: &quot;Of course God can create a rock so heavy that even He can&#039;t lift it. But He hasn&#039;t.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, that reminds me of what I always thought was a perfectly acceptable theistic answer: &#8220;Of course God can create a rock so heavy that even He can&#8217;t lift it. But He hasn&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hudson</title>
		<link>http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I, sadly, cannot remember where I read the following response to the question of God and Rocks, but this is it anyway:

Since God is all-powerful, there is nothing that he cannot do. This means that he can do both possible *and* impossible things. So he simply creates a rock that is so heavy he cannot lift it.

And lifts it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, sadly, cannot remember where I read the following response to the question of God and Rocks, but this is it anyway:</p>
<p>Since God is all-powerful, there is nothing that he cannot do. This means that he can do both possible *and* impossible things. So he simply creates a rock that is so heavy he cannot lift it.</p>
<p>And lifts it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atheology &#187; Thoughts &#38; Trees</title>
		<link>http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Atheology &#187; Thoughts &#38; Trees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheology.com/2007/04/13/god-rocks/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] God &amp; Rocks I wrote, Even if we concede the doubtful proposition that God can think thoughts, those thoughts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] God &amp; Rocks I wrote, Even if we concede the doubtful proposition that God can think thoughts, those thoughts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
