- If an action is right for us, it is right for others; and if wrong for others, it is wrong for us. Those who reject that standard simply declare that acts are justified by power. —Noam Chomsky
Meta
Recent Comments
- John Bates on Billy Graham on Atheism
- Believing Christian on Billy Graham on Atheism
- AGRO BUAH on God and Other Minds
- AGRO BUAH on Billy Graham on Atheism
- Nightvid Cole on Antony Flew is Dead
- Matthew Weatherford on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
- Matthew Weatherford on Atheism and Common Sense
- Matthew Weatherford on God and Other Minds
- Matthew Weatherford on Contingency and Necessity
- Compound on Why Are We Alive?
- John Bates on Atheism and Common Sense
- John Bates on Billy Graham on Atheism
- Dwight on Atheism and Common Sense
- Dwight on Prayers & Queries
- Sarah Marie Lapointe on Prayers & Queries
-
Recent Posts
- Billy Graham on Atheism
- Death of the Caliphate
- Women and Patriarchy
- Fixing Classical Arguments
- God and Other Minds
- Atheism and Common Sense
- Hector Avalos – Six Anti-Secularist Themes
- Do Test Tube Babies Have Souls?
- The Argument from Perfection
- Antony Flew is Dead
- Spiritual or Religious?
- Let’s Make a Deal
- Cosmological Arguments
- Moving to new host
- Huckabee and the U.S. Constitution
- Military Madness
- Torture and American Christianity
- Why atheism?
- IHEU corrects UN Human Rights Council
- Daylight Atheism
- Naturalism’s Touchstone Proposition
- What atheists have in common
- Prayers & Queries
- Does Life Have Meaning?
- Time & Change
Category Archives: Non-Existence Arguments
Intro to Thomas Aquinas
Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274) sought to find a workable fusion of Aristotle and the Church; nonetheless he strongly objected to Plato’s formulation of man as strictly a thinker and the Platonic abandonment of matter. In particular, Plato’s program consisted … Continue reading
Aquinas and the 2nd Way
I was first exposed to Aquinas’ 5 proofs of God’s existence as a college freshman — a strongly religious theistic freshman, at that — yet immediately I saw that his proofs were flawed. They didn’t work to prove God at … Continue reading
God’s Physical Problem
In the Warren-Flew Debate* on God’s existence, which took place in the North Texas State University Coliseum from Sept 20 to 23, 1976, Anthony Flew identified 4 ways in which the existence of a postulated being might be challenged. The … Continue reading
Two Types of Knowing
If the world outside of our thoughts was of the same essence as the world of our thoughts, there would be only one kind of knowing. Yet philosophers have long recognized that knowing comes in two distinct varieties. There is … Continue reading
Mind, Matter & Divine Creation
Perhaps the greatest challenge to a naturalistic worldview is explaining consciousness. This difficulty has several aspects. How did experiencing and consciousness evolve? For that matter why would it have evolved? But more troublesome than the evolutionary question is the basic … Continue reading
More Unintelligent Design
Intelligent Design advocates like to claim that evolution can’t explain the existence of “irreducible complexity” in humans and other species. But they would be much better served worrying about the far greater difficulty Intelligent Design faces: how to explain mistakes … Continue reading
Posted in Evolution & ID, Non-Existence Arguments
Leave a comment
Evolution — the Dividing Line
It’s not surprising that the issue of teaching evolution (or not — or countering it with intelligent design) keeps cropping up around the country. For practical purposes, evolution is the dividing line between theism and atheism. Evolution points the way … Continue reading
Agnosticism Revisited & the Case for Atheism
It is easy to understand how one can be undecided about the existence of God. I’m often undecided myself, since doubting my convictions is the first step in any serious analysis; yet I am as atheist as they come. Agnosticism … Continue reading
An Irreverent Look at God, Sex & Design
Theists like to argue that design—especially the complex design we see in organisms—is proof there must be a Designer. And theists denigrate evolution precisely because it provides an alternate explanation for design. If evolution suffices, then not only does there … Continue reading
Competing Moralities & Perfect God
The existence of evil is difficult to understand if we assume the universe is the product of a perfect God. However, embrace the scientific/evolutionary viewpoint and evil becomes understandable. After all, what is supremely “good” for the ebola virus is … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Non-Existence Arguments
Leave a comment
