- All religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the philosophers as false, and by the rulers as useful. —Seneca
Meta
Recent Comments
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Also Ran on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- rogue on Why Are We Alive?
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- Success1999 on Why Are We Alive?
- Success1999 on Why Are We Alive?
- art on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
- Mr. Four on Why Are We Alive?
- siouxz on Why Are We Alive?
- Andrew on CS Lewis’ Moral Argument
-
Recent Posts
- Billy Graham on Atheism
- Death of the Caliphate
- Women and Patriarchy
- Fixing Classical Arguments
- God and Other Minds
- Atheism and Common Sense
- Hector Avalos – Six Anti-Secularist Themes
- Do Test Tube Babies Have Souls?
- The Argument from Perfection
- Antony Flew is Dead
- Spiritual or Religious?
- Let’s Make a Deal
- Cosmological Arguments
- Moving to new host
- Huckabee and the U.S. Constitution
- Military Madness
- Torture and American Christianity
- Why atheism?
- IHEU corrects UN Human Rights Council
- Daylight Atheism
- Naturalism’s Touchstone Proposition
- What atheists have in common
- Prayers & Queries
- Does Life Have Meaning?
- Time & Change
Category Archives: Evolution & ID
Teach the Controversy
One thing advocates of teaching Intelligent Design (ID) in school like to say is why not expose kids to both sides and “teach the controversy.” I’m actually very sympathetic to this approach. The goal of education is to learn how … Continue reading
Posted in Evolution & ID, Naturalism
Leave a comment
More Unintelligent Design
Intelligent Design advocates like to claim that evolution can’t explain the existence of “irreducible complexity” in humans and other species. But they would be much better served worrying about the far greater difficulty Intelligent Design faces: how to explain mistakes … Continue reading
Posted in Evolution & ID, Non-Existence Arguments
Leave a comment
Intelligent Design Unveiled
Natural History magazine (4/02) has a set of articles on intelligent design: three by intelligent design advocates Michael J. Behe, William A. Dembski, and Jonathan Wells, followed by three responses by Kenneth R. Miller, Robert T. Pennock, and Eugenie C. … Continue reading
Posted in Evolution & ID, Naturalism
Leave a comment
