- Man is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones —Bertrand Russell Unpopular Essays, An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish
Meta
Recent Comments
- Dwight on How I Found Ungod
- r hampl on Templeton Prayer Study Flawed
- Chris Hobson on Do Test Tube Babies Have Souls?
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer | Atheology on Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer | Atheology on The Basics
- Homepage on The Argument from Perfection
- guest on Billy Graham on Atheism
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer | Atheology on Scepticism about Scientific Realism
- The Basics | Atheology on Thoughts, Feelings & Faith
- Rough Notes about Consciousness | Atheology on Do We Live in a Simulation?
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself | Atheology on Do We Live in a Simulation?
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself | Atheology on Rough Notes about Consciousness
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself | Atheology on The Basics
- Rough Notes about Consciousness | Atheology on Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
- Rough Notes about Consciousness | Atheology on The Basics
-
Recent Posts
- Gödel’s Mathematical Proof of God’s Existence
- Realism & Epirealism
- Primacy of Mind
- A B C Realities
- Questioning Direct Realism
- God’s Gender
- Two Types of Atheism
- How I Found Ungod
- Coherence of Naturalism
- Skepticism, Pragmatism and Empiricism
- Mind-Stuff
- Are Mountains Real?
- Elon Musk is bad at math
- Defining Naturalism the Right Way
- Roundess & What is Real
- John Shook’s analysis of Naturalism
- What is naturalism?
- Preface to Atheism
- Georges Lemaître & Naturalism as History
- Mastodon
- Muse is the Antidote
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
- Why Something Rather Than Nothing?
- Rough Notes about Consciousness
Category Archives: Nature of Knowledge
Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
Intelligence is being able to see what is right in front of you. Ignorance is looking at the world before you and seeing what you were taught to see. For thousands of years people looked at the night sky and … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum, Uncategorized
2 Comments
Rough Notes about Consciousness
I suspect that no topic has been obfuscated with more nonsense—religious, philosophical or scientific—than consciousness. First, the focus on what consciousness “is” usually starts at the wrong place, at what might be called “high up” complex consciousness, rather than beginning … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
1 Comment
Do We Live in a Simulation?
The human brain creates a simulation of the world around us from sensory inputs. This simulation is inside of us, and can be analyzed and known and expanded with supplemental knowledge. But some (actual) scientists are confused. They wonder if … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
2 Comments
Is Evolution a Fact?
It drives me crazy (not really, of course) when atheists (and lately even some scientists) assert that evolution is a “fact”. Now, the word “fact” can have various (conflicting) meanings. For example there is a sense in which calling something … Continue reading
Posted in Nature of Knowledge, Uncategorized
Comments Off on Is Evolution a Fact?
The Basics
For thousands of years philosophers have gotten the science of our existence wrong. They have mistakenly assumed that we know or perceive the world around us; we do not, we cannot. They have believed that our sense perceptions are direct … Continue reading
Cartesian Doubt
Philosophy begins with science. How do we know this? We can try to begin with philosophy. We can start with Cartesian doubt. Unfortunately for the history of philosophy, Rene Descartes did not take his first philosophy far enough. He began … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
5 Comments