- Beyond the region of the Probable is the Possible, and beyond the Possible is the Impossible and beyond the Impossible are the religions of this world. —Robert G. Ingersoll
Meta
Recent Comments
- r hampl on Templeton Prayer Study Flawed
- Chris Hobson on Do Test Tube Babies Have Souls?
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer | Atheology on Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer | Atheology on The Basics
- Homepage on The Argument from Perfection
- guest on Billy Graham on Atheism
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer | Atheology on Scepticism about Scientific Realism
- The Basics | Atheology on Thoughts, Feelings & Faith
- Rough Notes about Consciousness | Atheology on Do We Live in a Simulation?
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself | Atheology on Do We Live in a Simulation?
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself | Atheology on Rough Notes about Consciousness
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself | Atheology on The Basics
- Rough Notes about Consciousness | Atheology on Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
- Rough Notes about Consciousness | Atheology on The Basics
- Dwight on Atheism v Naturalism
-
Recent Posts
- Are Mountains Real?
- Elon Musk is bad at math
- Defining Naturalism the Right Way
- Roundess & What is Real
- John Shook’s analysis of Naturalism
- What is naturalism?
- Preface to Atheism
- Georges Lemaître & Naturalism as History
- Mastodon
- Muse is the Antidote
- Fallacies of the Naive Observer
- Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
- Why Something Rather Than Nothing?
- Rough Notes about Consciousness
- Do We Live in a Simulation?
- Atheism v Naturalism
- Bill Nye, Ken Ham, and the Bible
- When Biology Trumps Physics
- Is Evolution a Fact?
- Scepticism about Scientific Realism
- Framing Free Will
- The Basics
- Naturalism and Knowledge
- Secular Solemnizing Statement
- An Aura of Ownership
Category Archives: Simulacrum
Are Mountains Real?
[Post at Preface to Atheism, Apr 27, 2024.] When philosophers ask if something is real, they mean: Does it exist independently of our thoughts? Whose thoughts, exactly? Well, generally, human thoughts. Our in this context means us as a species. … Continue reading
Posted in Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
Leave a comment
Fallacies of the Naive Observer
Today I’m going to discuss a fallacy common to observers of the physical world (people like us), one which has significant practical importance. I call it the naive observer fallacy, and it goes something like this. (1) Observers bring biases … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum, Supernaturalism
Comments Off on Fallacies of the Naive Observer
Mind is the Brain Improving Itself
Intelligence is being able to see what is right in front of you. Ignorance is looking at the world before you and seeing what you were taught to see. For thousands of years people looked at the night sky and … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum, Uncategorized
2 Comments
Rough Notes about Consciousness
I suspect that no topic has been obfuscated with more nonsense—religious, philosophical or scientific—than consciousness. First, the focus on what consciousness “is” usually starts at the wrong place, at what might be called “high up” complex consciousness, rather than beginning … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
1 Comment
Do We Live in a Simulation?
The human brain creates a simulation of the world around us from sensory inputs. This simulation is inside of us, and can be analyzed and known and expanded with supplemental knowledge. But some (actual) scientists are confused. They wonder if … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
2 Comments
The Basics
For thousands of years philosophers have gotten the science of our existence wrong. They have mistakenly assumed that we know or perceive the world around us; we do not, we cannot. They have believed that our sense perceptions are direct … Continue reading
Cartesian Doubt
Philosophy begins with science. How do we know this? We can try to begin with philosophy. We can start with Cartesian doubt. Unfortunately for the history of philosophy, Rene Descartes did not take his first philosophy far enough. He began … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Nature of Knowledge, Simulacrum
5 Comments
Seeing Red – Understanding Consciousness
An article by John Searle (“Minding the Brain”) in the Nov 2, 2006 edition of The New York Review of Books shows how confused most of us (including philosophers & scientists) are about something as everyday as vision. Searle reviewed … Continue reading
Posted in Atheology, Naturalism, Simulacrum
Comments Off on Seeing Red – Understanding Consciousness